Monday, 13 July 2020

Panel Discussion: International Webinar on Internet of Things - Prospects and Challenges in Pandemic Situation

On 4th July 2020, I participated in a panel discussion on the above title in Parkistan, which was moderated by Prof. Muhammad Musa Kaleem, from Federal URDU University of Science and Technology, Islamabad.

The webinar talk was jointly organised by Learners Podcast and Placement Bureau, Federal URDU University, Islamabad, FUUAST on the topic of Internet of Things (Prospects and Challenges). This talk is in continuation of series of talks initiated by Learners Podcast on "COVID-19: Challenge to Employability ". The Audience of this webinar were university students, faculty members, and all those who have an interest in knowing about IOT technology. The webinar was held using the ZOOM platform. 



The Panelists were:


He is currently a Dean Electrical Engineering in Federal URDU University, Islamabad. Dr, Naveed did his Ph.D in Communication and Information Systems, Dalian University of Technology, China. He did his masters in Computer and Communication Networks from France. He holds degree of Electronic Engineering from Pakistan. His main research areas are Wireless Communication, Wireless Sensor & Adhoc network and Underwater Communication.


He receives his PhD in Computer Science from the prestigious University of Technology Malaysia (UTM), MSc in Computer Science from Bayero University Kano (BUK), Nigeria and a Bachelor of Technology in Mathematics with Computer Science from the FUT Minna, Nigeria. He was the former Head of Department (HOD) and a pioneer member of the first Cyber Security Science Department in Nigeria at the Federal University of Technology (FUT) Minna. At the time he is visiting research scholar as an Assistant Professor of Cybersecurity in IT Department, Community College of Qatar (CCQ), Doha, Qatar.

3. Dr. Syed Hamid Hussain MADNI (Malaysia)


Dr. Hamid is a currently based in Malaysia. He received his PhD from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). His areas of interest are cloud computing, analysis of algorithm, network security, e-commerce, web development and Internet of Things. His area of research is “Optimal Resource Scheduling for Infrastructure as a Service in Cloud Computing based on Cuckoo Search”.



4. Dr. Zubair Khalid (Parkistan)

Dr. Zubair received the Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Malaysia in 2017 and M.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila in 2012. He is currently Assistant Professor at the Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal Urdu University of Arts Science and Technology, Islamabad.


 

Thursday, 9 July 2020

Excellence and Mediocrity in the Academia


Excellence in education need not mean elitism, and equity need not mediocrity” – Mary Jean LeTendre

I recently watched a short debate on Channels TV, Sunrise Daily programme, between two Nigerian academics. The two scholars were: Dr. Akyala Ishaku, who came to the programme to establish the existence of the COVID-19 virus in Nigeria and the other gentleman was Professor Cyril Otoikhian, who was there to disprove the existence of the virus altogether. For the avoidance of doubt, I am neither a life scientist nor a virologist. So, I will resist the temptation of passing a verdict on who among them won the debate. Rather, in this piece, I would like to concentrate on the instruments of science, academic methodologies and scientific references deployed by both parties to argue their cases.

For your information, before watching the program, I have never heard of the two senior colleagues. It was after watching the said program that I did a little background check and found out that Dr. Akyala is a lecturer and a virologist at the Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Nasarawa State University, Keffi, Nasarawa State and he also has an affiliation with the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands. While Prof. Cyril is a Professor of genetics at the Novena University, Kwale, Delta State. Also, I have never heard of the Novena University in Nigeria until that same day (please forgive my ignorance).  Therefore, I can safely declare that I do not have any conflict of interest in their debate.

To begin his defence, Dr. Akyala laid out how a scientific debate is done, how hypothesis are being proven with empirical evidence, and how a counter argument is being put forward to disprove existing order or hypothesis. He then reeled out established scientific evidences as published by reputable first quartile high impact factor scientific journals like the Lancet and Nature that established the existence, origin, and evolution of the Coronavirus in over 700 published journal articles. He later narrowed down his arguments to Nigeria and cited the results of a recent research conducted by African Center of Excellence for Genomics of Infectious Diseases headed by Prof. Christian Happi at the Redeemer’s University, Ede, Osun State. The research was able to establish the existence of COVID-19 in Nigeria with over 20 clusters spread around the country. At this point, I was already deep in thought of what the counter argument of this TV debate is going to look like. Because, to me, the debate is already over before it actually began.  

To my surprise, Professor Cyril started his defence by saying he wonders why Dr. Akyala is sounding this way. Then, the University Don goes ahead to explain what he knows as the scientific method. In his words, he said: “whatever they are doing inside (the Lab), let them bring it outside and put it on a table. Let every scientists be available, let all samples be available, let all reagents be on the table, the cameras be available and let them show us what they are calling COVID-19.” He added: “but all I saw was a funny attempt that would not yield any results”. He mentioned the name of the American immunologist Anthony Fauci, but did not make reference to any of his published works and then concluded that COVID-19 is not even real at all. And the Professor went on rambling until I got lost. But I can understand why the professor wondered why Dr. Akyala is sounding the way he did. The truth is that, the scientific method and reference sources used by Akyala are actually alien to the University Don. To put it mildly, Cyril came to the fight with a stick, while Akyala showed-up with a bazooka!

In his second outing on the same TV programme, Dr. Akyala said that he did a little background check on Professor Cyril by searching for his contributions in Google Scholar and he found out that he has never publish any work in virology in any impact factor journal. That was the last straw that broke the camel's back. But when the Professor was given a chance to defend himself on why he has no published contribution in an impact factor journal. The University Don quickly created an imaginary enemy for himself who is all over the internet pulling down his contributions to knowledge, including his social media posts. He said that he became a professor by assessment, and that he has more than 120 publications across different areas of specialisations that he has studied. Then, he made references to videos of Fauci and videos of himself in ITV Benin. This, to me, is a national disgrace! Because I cannot imagine how a professor would make reference to edited online videos posted by conspiracy theorist as evidence to win a scientific debate on a national television.      

In all honesty, I understand the type of publications that Prof. Cyril claimed to have published to become a professor (I do not want to say much on that, except that they are publications that are normally packaged in Ghana-Must-Go bags and moved around our campuses during promotion exercise). I also understand the type of publications that Dr. Akyala made reference to as well. The two scholars were actually not talking about the same thing, and therefore cannot flow at the same frequency. In reality, we still have academics who do not know anything about high impact factor journals, and reputable scientific sources like ISI Web of Science or Scopus. Also, we have academics who still do not understand the concept of rigorous peer-review process. That is one of main banes of the academic community of this country (I call it our little secret). Unfortunately, it cannot be my burden to educate you in this limited space. If you are a University lecturer and you wish to make contribution to knowledge, then I strongly advise you to study the best practices in scientific methodologies and know about academic databases for reputable scientific literatures. You should try as much as possible to put what you have learned into practice without making compromises. Then, establish yourself by publishing your research works in internationally recognised platforms. Otherwise, you may become what one of my academic friends used to call Ghost Professors (which means academics whose works cannot be found in any serious academic database).


The fact that Dr. Akyala used only Google Scholar to discredit the academic qualities of his co-debater and, also, the fact that Google Scholar is not even a serious academic database, shows how lowly rated the professor is. Google Scholar is mainly used to monitor general citations and h-index, and it is still not recognised by research Universities. And anybody with a good first degree in science ought to know what science is and how it works. So, for the professor to argue the way he did, inspite of the scientific evidences for COVID-19 presented by Dr. Akyala, shows that he is a mediocre. Therefore, the professor's main problem is not because his works are not on Google Scholar, but rather a complete misunderstanding of science and its methods. If this kind of gross misunderstanding of science is allowed to spread in the academic and scientific community, the consequences would be better imagined than experienced.


Dr. Shafi’i Hamidu is a lecturer at Federal University of Technology Minna and he wrote-in from Doha.

Twitter: @shafiihamidu
FaceBook:  Shafi'i Hamidu




PUBLISHED IN:


1. The Nation published this article with the title "Science versus pseudoscience: Case of two dons", 10/07/2020



2. Nigeria Village Square published this piece with the title "", 10/07/2020



Thursday, 26 February 2015

#CHAfrica: Buhari’s Response to My Tweet at Chatham House



On 26th of February 2015, the prestigious Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs London hosted General Muhammadu Buhari. The presidential candidate of the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) who delivered a lecture titled “Prospects for Democratic Consolidation in Africa: Nigeria's Transition”. The former British High Commissioner to Nigeria, Sir Richard Gozney chaired the event.

Many audience across the globe including yours sincerely followed the event via online live streaming. We were also given the opportunity to ask our questions on twitter using the hashtag #CHAfrica. Without wasting any time, I tweeted a series of questions to voice out the concern of many voiceless Nigerians. I was lucky the chair picked one of my tweets out of hundredths of tweets from Nigerians on twitter and read it as the last question for the event. Mr. Richard Gozney clearly and politely mentioned my name before he asked him “Mr. Shafi’i Hamidu who doesn’t give his age asked; is it relevant to the election - your age? What are you planning to say to people about your old age?” The moderator rephrased my question to make it look nicer as he earlier mentioned, but this is the original tweet;



His response to this question was;

Well, I am very happy that I have been able to visit the 35 states out of 36 and I haven’t broken down. Somebody announced me dead yesterday! I had a call from Maiduguri that somebody rushed into a friend’s house crying; that Buhari has dead in the hospital in London, so he called me and I laughed my head off. Ahh so certainly, I would be expecting too much if I don’t expect people to be wishing me death. So, but I am very pleased I am fit and my doctors have declared me fit. I’m now going back for the final onslaught on the PDP.


GMB Chatham House Lecture (move to 18:07 to listen to my question)
.................................................

Let me assure GMB and anybody reading this post that I have long ago made-up my mind that a Buhari's government would be far better than this chaos we are in. Many of us have since prefer the the old and focused, than the young and confused. Therefore, the reason for my question is to make sure he uses the opportunity to discuss this issue and assure Nigerians especially those that express genuine concern about his age. I’m happy that he responded to it in the most humorous way possible. Now it is left to the Thomases to either stay in doubt or to believe and have faith in Papa. For those clowns that are wishing him death and even go as far as announcing him dead in a London hospital, I say to them; you do not have control over who lives or who die. Our lives are in the hands of Almighty and I recommend GMB and his campaign team to never listen to such people. They don’t deserve our time.

As for me, I have done my bit by highlighting the concern of those with genuine intention and I’m satisfied with his answer. In short, his answer was even more superb than I expected. I wish him more strength as I strongly believe he still has a lot to offer to our country. 

Article not edited yet, so I apologize for any typing error. Thank you.  

Shafi’i Hamidu wrote-in from the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Twitter: @shafiihamidu
FaceBook:  Shafi'i Hamidu

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

Piece of Peace: Against Provocative Campaigns, Threats and Violence (2)



When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.”  Jimi Hendrix

 

 

Few days after my widely circulated article titled Piece of Peace: 2015 Elections, was published, I received the news that the two leading presidential candidates in Nigeria - incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Gen. Mohammadu Buhari of the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) have signed a peace accord ahead of the general elections in February, 2015. The images of these two gentlemen hugging each other and smiling at the venue of the peace deal greeted the cyberspace with warm reception. Many of us that saw those pictures circulating on the internet immediately welcomed this development because it symbolized peace, understanding, tolerance and hope. Yours sincerely was particularly very ecstatic, feeling somebody was listening to my #PieceOfPeace. I really felt we were making progress towards having a relatively peaceful general election in Nigeria, until recently when my escalated hope was put on a very serious doubt just few days later.

 

Muhammadu Buhari & Goodluck Jonathan

It all started with a sitting governor of a supposedly highly enlightened Nigerian state putting up an advertorial in the front pages of supposedly highly respected Nigerian dailies wishing the candidate of the opposition party death. In more clear terms, a sitting governor that suppose to be at the forefront of peace advocacy placed a death-wish advert in the national dailies for the opposition candidate. It sounds unbelievable, but that was what happened in the binoculars of all living Nigerians including our security agencies. Yes, some things can only happen in Nigeria, but this one was far at the extreme! I understand the sponsor of this provocative advert has a history of behaving in a very comical way, but even a clown should not crack this inciting joke in any circus. I also heard that his party came out to dissociate themselves from the publication. Well, that is good but it’s not enough. What I expect from the party was to condemn the said publication, ask him to retract it by issuing an apology letter not only to the candidate but also to the millions of Nigerians that he incited. This apology letter should be publish in the front pages of the same newspapers he used. Having failed in controlling such a loose child, the party should know that they have set a rhythm for a very dangerous dance. As it is the mango fruit that causes the mango tree to be stoned. Therefore, if anybody is asking for the first party to contravene the Abuja peace accord, do not look beyond this provocative advertorial.

 

While the nation was yet to fully recover from this shock, she received another blow in faraway Katsina - a state that has branded itself to be the nation’s home of hospitality and not hostility. This time it was the convoy of Mr. President that was stoned by miscreants during a campaign rally. It was an act that needs to be condemned by all right thinking human beings. As expected, both parties came out and dissociated themselves, then went ahead to condemn the disrespectful act. To me those were not enough. It is important to note that, even though the state is the home state of the leading opposition candidate Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, the paradox is that, the state is governed and controlled by the leading PDP. Again, many of us cannot forget in a hurry how the governor of that same state was recently caught in a video camera inciting his supporters to kill the opposition – just like during the Rwandan genocide, he was making reference to killing cockroaches. But to my greatest surprise the director of media and publicity of the PDP presidential campaign organisation, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, was quick to blame the opposition for the attack, while in an effort to exonerate their party from this blame. The oppositions also blamed the PDP for stage planning the attack themselves. All this to me was a show of shame.

 

As if we have not seen the end of it, another attack was unleashed on the campaign train of Mr. Present again but this time around it was in Bauchi state – another state governed and controlled by the ruling PDP. In what came as a surprise to everyone, the governor of the state Alhaji Isa Yuguda was quick to exonerate the opposition from blames. He asserted in an interview that it was some disgruntled elements from within his party that intentionally planned the attack to discredit him.  At this juncture, I am tempted to ask this question: why is all the incitements and violence coming from the PDP-controlled states?

 

Nigeria is like a very old water tank; just when you try to fix water leakage from one position another position just bursts. Oh yes, you only need to know about the threats coming from those glorified Niger-Delta ex-militants to agree with this old water tank analogy. In faraway Bayelsa state, a group of ex-militants that benefited from the peaceful amnesty program of the late former president Umaru Musa Yar’adua are now trying to distort the peace of the nation. According to newspaper reports, they regrouped in the state government house at Yenagoa to discuss about the 2015 general elections and at the end of the meeting they issued a threat of violence to the nation. The warlords threatened that, in the event that Mr. President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan loses the election in February, there will be war! In a sane nation, these nuisances should by now be cooling off in a Kiri-Kiri maximum security prison for treasonable felony. But before I forget, Bayelsa state is the hometown of Mr. President and is also governed and controlled by the PDP.   

 

I call on all Nigerians not to be intimidated by this empty threat or any similar one that may come in the future. No one should be allowed to be cowed into voting against his or her wish. The future of our country lies finally in our votes. We finally have another opportunity to make it right as a nation. While I shall continue to call on all of us to avoid any act of violence, I shall also continue to call on all of us to vote wisely because our vote is our right. This is just a #PieceOfPeace.

 

Shafi’i Hamidu wrote-in from the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Twitter: @shafiihamidu