Monday, 18 August 2014

Half-free is Never Freedom – To Whom It May Concern


“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” ― George Washington
 

I wish to have titled this piece ‘In Defence of John Danfulani’, but I understand that the gentleman in question had filed a lawsuit in the Industrial Court and I have no intention of tampering or pre-empting a judicial proceeding. Therefore, my piece is more of an advice to anyone or any organ of government that wish to be used to intimidate any citizen into silence by fiddling with his or her basic right to free speech. The freedom of speech is an absolute state to fully express thoughts and there is no such thing as being half-free; it is either you are free or not free.

The ability to come out openly and voice out the concerns of your people is not only bravery, but it is also a right that everyone must enjoy. It is about calmly speaking the truth when everyone else is silenced, when the truth cannot be expressed. It is about speaking out with a different voice, risking the wrath of the state and offending everyone, for the sake of the truth, and the writer’s conscience. For many a time, when I listen to some political sycophants speaking with the caution of trying to please a master, I wish for an alternative voice. Danfulani has consistently provided that voice, especially for the people of Southern Kaduna. He has fearlessly expressed himself writing from the good, to the bad and everything in between. Whether his style is likable is not what is important; the pivotal point is he says it the way he sees it, and in most cases, that is the true reflection of the feelings of his people. I wonder why we keep missing this point. Therefore, before I proceed with my submission, permit me a space to turban on your platform Dr. John Danfulani as the Sarkin Yakin Samarin Kudanchin Zazzau.

I read with great concern a news article, in some of the Nigerian media outlets, a story that says the poor lecturer had been served with a warning letter by the Council of his University i.e Kaduna State University (KASU) for allegedly denigrating in the social media the Visitor of the University who doubles as the Governor of the state, Alhaji Mukhtar Ramalan Yero. At this point, I wish to state that I do not know Dr. John Danfulani beyond what I read of him on the cyberspace and I have never seen him or met him anywhere. At the same time, I do not know any of the Council members of KASU. I do not need to know any of them. But I feel an urgent Zazzau intervention is required before the issue takes the usual political turn between the two major political divides in the state. This warning must not be allowed to stand for many reasons. In the first place, was Alhaji Mukhtar Ramalan Yero been criticized in his capacity as a Governor of the state or the Visitor of the University? If it was in his capacity as a Governor, then there is no case and KASU should not even dabble into it. The gentleman is a patriotic and concerned citizen of the state who has all the rights to say all that are needed to be said to make sure the state was being run properly. On the other hand, if the criticizing was directed to his office as the Visitor of the University, as alleged, the gentleman still has right to criticise the office as a dedicated staff of the University, because no office is above criticism. Even if the criticism is directed at his person, KASU Council still has no business in it, because it should be the responsibility of Alhaji Ramalan Yero to take-up the matter himself. In any case, why are we even afraid of criticism?

Yes, I understand that speaking the truth to the powers that be sometimes requires wisdom, but everyone is different and we all have different ways of expressing ourselves. Therefore, what is important is the wisdom of the reader to separate the grains from the sand; the wisdom of the reader to separate the message from the messenger.  The wisdom of the reader to challenge the idea put forward by the writer intellectually wherever opinions differ. But most importantly is the wisdom of whosoever is concerned to act based on the positive criticisms until there are no more loopholes for the critic to criticize. In other words, action speaks louder than the voice.

The University don is a political scientist by profession and he has a Ph.D to show for it. It is normal for a political scientist to comment on political issues around him, not even when he sees it as a community service. By the way, community service is one of the essential components for an academician to get promoted into the Professorial cadre. In his quest to liberate his Southern Kaduna people from political slavery, many power brokers have in the past come under the hammer of his mighty pen. Some of which includes the Senator representing his constituency at the national assembly, the Southern Kaduna political elites, the first republic northern elders, some sycophantic Southern Kaduna youth movements and also the state and federal government security apparatus for their lackadaisical attitude towards the protection of lives and properties in the state. He has never shied away from condemning any perceived injustice including the ones done on adherents of other religions, like the recent killings of Shi’at people in Zaria. In all these, we never heard the voice of KASU council restraining him or any other person. Therefore, it is ironic how they suddenly found their lost pen to prevent him from commenting on their almighty Visitor. In the words of Neil Gaiman: “if you don't stand up for the stuff you don't like, when they come for the stuff you do like, you've already lost.”

KASU is a new state-owned University, but the decision of Danfulani to take-up a career as political scientist came even before KASU was established. Therefore, any attempt to send him into political hibernation is ill-conceived and cannot stand. It is a very bad precedence that KASU is trying to start, especially on many of us that work in various institutions in Nigeria and wish to chip in one or two pieces of advice to our leaders. This miscalculated warning is already breeding more political enemies to your Visitor than friends. And believe me, it is also projecting your institution in a very bad light. My advice to the council of every newly founded state university is that they should try and concentrate on the development of more Danfulanis by sponsoring many of their staff to obtain higher degrees and clear the bottom-heavy staffing system they always run. Dabbling into politics by an institution of higher learning is definitely not the way to progress. 

God bless Kaduna State,
God bless Nigeria, amin. 

Shafi’i Hamidu wrote-in from the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Twitter: @shafiihamidu
FaceBook:  Shafi'i Hamidu


PUBLISHED IN:
  
1. Leadership Newspaper, "Half-free is Never Freedom",  

2.

3.

4.













11.






14

Thursday, 15 May 2014

The Aesthetics of the Malaysian Wildlife: My Skudai Experience

“Air yang tenang jangan disangka tiada buaya” translated as “Don’t think there are no crocodiles because the water is calm.” -  Malay Proverb

Likewise,

“Ba a cinikin biri a sama” translated as "You can’t bargain a monkey, when it is still on the tree." -  African (Hausa) Proverb 



As an African student that just arrived to study in Malaysia, I was very curious with almost everything that I came across. And one of the most fascinating things that attracted my attention for a very long time was the way and manner the Malaysians allowed wild animals to live freely within their society. They were allowed to interact with humans without posing any serious threat to the society. They live in their natural habitats without being domesticated. Some of the animals that I saw moving freely at the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai campus includes; the monkeys, the water monitors, different species of snakes, the ducks, the squirrels, the numerous wall gecko lizards, the cats and the horses (securely kept and friendly). Back in Nigeria some of these animals are nice ingredients for an African delicacy. They are popularly known as Bush meats. 

One particular incident that I find it difficult to forget took place in my first week in the UTM Skudai campus. I was together with some new students that came from the Middle-Eastern countries, when a water monitor passed just very close to where we were standing. One of the Arab students with us shouted "Wow this is crocodile let's run!” He scared the hell out of the rest, except yours sincerely. I came from Africa precisely Nigeria, and I know the difference between a crocodile and a monitor, so I was not moved by his unexpected reaction. I took my time to school him that this is not a crocodile but a water monitor. I then went further to ask him, “Haven’t you seen a monkey in this campus before?” and his response was “a monkey is okay, but a crocodile is out of this world and not safe in the school environment”. It was quite funny and an experience that I will always remember.

The Malaysian Monkey is also called Monyet in the local language Bahasa Malayu. The first time I came in contact with a monkey in Malaysia was also in my first week in school. I booked for accommodation at the hostel (Kolej). It was a good accommodation in a relatively very quite environment. I never expect to see any monkey near human settlements as it was the norm back in Nigeria where I came from. Coupled with the fact that I stayed in the fourth floor of the building, I was so confident that I left my windows wide open when I was going to the lab. When I came back from the lab, I met my room very scattered and discombobulated. At first I thought it was someone that enters the room to steal.  So, I came out to ask my uncaring and unfriendly neighbors. Then, they told me it was the monkeys that did that. I immediately rushed back and peeped through the window, and I saw a dozen of the monkeys looking at me unrepentantly. Now I know, this is not Africa where the monkeys will be running for their dear lives by mere sighting the humans. They are just hunting meats for a very delicious African gourmet. I miss that food. I wish I will have a license to do some hunting in Skudai.

I have seen many water monitors in Skudai. In one instance, I came very close to matching one by the roadside close to my Faculty. I quickly rushed and grabbed my camera to get a snap shot of it, as it swiftly dived into to the nearby river. I was not so lucky to get the picture.

The Malaysian duck is also known as Itik in Bahasa Malayu. In one of the most popular African language called Hausa language, the duck is also called Agwagwa. Ducks are mostly aquatic birds, mostly smaller than the swans and geese, and may be found in both fresh water and sea water. In contrast, the African duck is mostly domesticated and live in the same environments with the humans. This is another good source of proteins, especially from the eggs and the rich meat.

The Malaysian Squirrels are also known as the Tupai in the local language Bahasa Malayu. These are rat-like tree climbers that are brownish in colour with bushy or hairy tails. I so much like it because of its speed, bravery and mesmerizing tree climbing skills. Back at home, we have to go into the thick forest to hunt some, but in Skudai they are seen just about everywhere. With a license to live and not to be hunted, as conservation is a serious business in Malaysia.

The Malaysian Wall Gecko lizard is popularly called the Cicak in the local language Bahasa Malayu, it is called lizards by the locals in Skudai. Most geckos are nocturnal, hiding during the day and foraging for insects at night. Coming from Africa, I find it difficult to accept that a Gecko is also called a Lizard because it’s simply not one. They may belong to the same family biologically, but they are certainly not lizards. As the proverb goes - in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is a king. In Africa, we also have Geckos, but they are not qualified to be called Lizards because we have the real ones called the Agama Lizard.

If you are a wild enthusiasts like me, then Skudai in Malaysia is an aesthetic place to visit.

Malaysia truly Asia.

Shafi’i Muhammad Abdulhamid is a Nigerian student, who wrote this from the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Twitter: @shafiihamidu
FaceBook: 
Shafi'i Hamidu

Sunday, 20 April 2014

Alex Ferguson: My Autobiography – A Fan's Review


“It was important to the Glazers that there was no long period of speculation when my retirement became official. They wanted the new man in place within days. With no prospect of a change in my thinking, the discussion turned to who might replace me. There was a unanimous agreement – David Moyes was the man.” – Sir Alex Ferguson
 

Sir Alex Ferguson had maintained that this autobiography was an account for the Manchester United supporters. Those who had remained faithful and dedicated to the club, and were owed an explanation of the gaps remaining in his 27 years reign as a manager in the club. After reading this book, I found this was absolutely so. It looks like a conversation from the grandpa giving you a straight-talk about how he managed his life, with all the blunders of judgments. Then his determination to maintain a very high standard and understanding early, that no man is greater than the club. It was a story of success. But to me, the most intriguing part of this autobiography was his confrontation with his fearless captain Roy Kean that led to the latter leaving the club!

Before reading this book, I have a million questions which I wish to have the opportunity to ask Fergie, but now I was left with just a handful. One of the questions that continued to baffle my mind even after reading this book was his decision to choose David Moyes as a successor out of all the wonderful football managers in the world. I read through the whole book, and the old man did not give any strong footballing reason for that decision. Fergie’s only reason was that Moyes was a Scottish and Scots have a dourness of strong will to be successful. He strengthens this point by saying Moyes's father was also a good coach back in the days at Drumchapel, and he believes he has some of these traits in him. The only statement I read that was close to being a footballing reason for this selection was when he said – Moyes was a fine judge of talent and laid on some marvelous football at Everton when he was allowed to sign a higher class of player. All these to me are ridiculous reasons, because United has a winning mentality which either David Moyes did not understand or he is not capable of sustaining. And again, Fergie should know better that there is a big difference between winning mentality and playing a marvelous football; a case study of Arsenal. I am not of the opinion that United should hire an established coach as the Mourinhos, the Van Gaals or the Capellos, because I want the tradition of the club to be upheld. I still find it difficult to understand why Fergie did not pick amoung the players or ex-players he nurtured. Players that passed through the never say die school of Fergie time. Players that understood the winning mentality and the tradition of United and will do anything possible to upheld that. Prominent amoung these players and ex-players are; some of the class of '92 like Ryan Giggs, Paul Scholes or the Nevilles. I will also be more comfortable with the baby-face of Ole Gunnar Solskjær or the mighty figure of Eric Cantona. What is wrong in choosing our longest serving captain Bryan Robson or our former center back Steve Bruce? Now, this decision of choosing Moyes is putting the team through torture and the fans through hell.

For many of us that have been very faithful in supporting the club over a long time, we find it difficult to easily forget the untimely departure of our fearless captain, Roy Keane. This is the beginning of our mid-field crises that are yet to be resolved. Keano as he was popularly known was a highly opinionated personality. He always thinks he is right even when he was wrong, and that was what made Mick McCarthy (the Republic of Ireland Manager) to send him out of the 2002 World Cup at Japan/Korea camp. During that trying period, Fergie supported Keano even when he knew he was wrong. But if you are looking for an example of how a player and his coach fell apart, then the saga of Ferguson versus Roy Keane is a classical case. Their problem stated when Fergie supported Carlos Queiroz (the assistant coach) after he had some misunderstandings with Keano over accommodation arrangements during pre-season tour at Portugal. After he came back to England, Keano took on to MUTV and seriously criticized most of his team-mates for not putting their weight during matches. It was so serious that the editors refused to air it and sent the tape to Fergie for his assessment. The old man was dumfounded! He could not believe Keano will let down his team-mates in the public. The following morning, he called for a meeting of all the players and coaching staff. He played the video for them to see. Keano was quick to ask whether the players had a problem with what they had just seen. Edwin van der Sar and Ruud Van Nestrooy took on him, but the hardest part of Keano’s body was his mouth. So, he uses his blade tongue to slaughter everybody and then saved the best for the old man when he said ‘You brought your private life into the club with your argument with Magnier,’ At that point the players started leaving. It was a shameful ending because, by morning, our legend was on his way out of Old Trafford. No player is bigger than the club.

Keane was right to have made that pronouncement to Fergie. In short, he had said the minds of many fans out there that will never have the opportunity to tell the old man the truth. But the problem was that; he also went about it the wrong way and at the wrong time. The story of Magnier and the racehorse called Rock of Gibraltar was another thing that the book refused to expatiate on, and I think it was intentional. Magnier was a former Manchester United co-owner from Ireland. Magnier and Ferguson also co-owned the racehorse that won many races. The row that blew up over the successful horse and Ferguson’s claim on the stud rights, consumed the club from Ferguson’s first legal action in January 2003 to the legal settlement in March 2004 and beyond to the Glazer takeover in May 2005. McManus and Magnier owned almost 30 per cent of the club and eventually sold out to the current owner, the Glazers. The fans did not like it when the Glazers came from America and took over the club. And it was this racehorse thing that caused it. Fergie liked it that way because they gave him more power and also increased his salary. How can an important story like this that consumed the former owners of the club be conspicuously omitted from this all important autobiography? If you are a fan of Keano or David Beckham then you may not enjoy the book, because they were portrayed in a bad light.      

But one thing that I like so much in the book was honesty in narration especially when it comes to stating the obvious. For example, in the 19th chapter titled – Small is Beautiful, he made the following statement;

“BARCELONA were the best team ever to line up against my Manchester United sides. Easily the best. They brought the right mentality to the contest. We had midfield players in our country – Patrick Vieira, Roy Keane, Bryan Robson – who were strong men, warriors; winners. At Barcelona they had these wonderful mites, 5 feet 6 inches tall, with the courage of lions, to take the ball all the time and never allow themselves to be bullied. The accomplishments of Lionel Messi, Xavi and Andrés Iniesta were amazing to me.”

I remembered the old man’s hand shaking terribly in that UEFA Champions League final at Wembley stadium against Barcelona in 2011. I was even scared he might get a heart attack, especially when he spits out that his iconic chewing gum. But when he spoke about his strikers, this is what he has to say;

“If you put my great goal-scorers together (Andy Cole, Eric Cantona, Van Nistelrooy, Rooney), Ruud was the most prolific. But the best natural finisher was Solskjaer. Van Nistelrooy scored some magnificent goals, but many were scabby, six-yard box goals. Andy Cole scored some fine goals, too, but plenty were close in, scrambled, off the leg, just-get-it-in goals. Solskjaer’s finishing, though, could be majestic. His thought processes underpinned his skills. He had that analytical mind. As soon as he arrived in a shooting position, he had it all sized up. He had mental pictures everywhere. Yet he didn’t play all the time because he wasn’t the most aggressive of strikers.”

Surely, I all watched them played, and I cannot agree more. Simply put. Fergie had worked with many world class strikers including Henrik Larsson (Sweden), Robin van Persie (Holland), Michael Owen and Teddy Sheringham (both of England). But, unfortunately, in this case his call was right. No space for the Uruguayan and two-time winner of both the Pichichi Trophy and the European Golden Shoe Diego Forlán talk less of Chicharito Hernández of Mexico.

He also picked that Wayne Rooney’s bicycle kick against Man City in February 2011 as the greatest goal in his time at United. When he was invited to Everton academy for the first time to watch Rooney play, his remark was, “This was a man playing in under-age football.” Rooney was portrayed in this book as a greedy fellow that owes the United fans an apology because twice he puts up transfer request. But, he praised Cristiano Ronaldo as the most gifted player that he had worked with as a manager.     

One last question which the book did not address was this popular allegation especially in Africa that Ferguson does not like black players of African origin. Whether the allegation was true or not, only two black African players featured in his 27 years reign in Manchester United; Quinton Fortune (South Africa) and Eric Djemba-Djemba (Cameroon). These two only struggled to make the first team for some time and then faded away. His attempt to get a Nigerian player, John Mikel Obi, ended in controversy. I wish he uses this opportunity to clarify this unfounded racist allegation against him. He missed it. But, one thing that you cannot take away from the grandpa was his achievements. He played four UEFA Champions League finals and won two. He won the old European Cup Winners’ Cup in 1991. He also won the Premier League 13 times and then played in eight FA Cup finals and won five. Played seven League Cup finals and won four. He also won the Intercontinental Cup and the European Super Cup in 1999, and the FIFA World Club Cup in 2008. Not forgetting the ten Charity Shield Cups in his cabinet. Sir Alex Ferguson is the most decorated Premier League manager ever. All hail the King of soccer. It’s Fergie time.     

United we stand.


Shafi’i Muhammad Abdulhamid wrote-in from the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Twitter: @shafiihamidu
FaceBook: 
Shafi'i Hamidu


DISCLAIMER: This is NOT a literary review, instead, it is a review of major events in the book from the little eyes of a fan. 



PUBLISHED IN:

1. Abusidiqu, "Alex Ferguson: My Autobiography – A Fan Review", 20/04/2014

2. NewsDiary, "Alex Ferguson: My Autobiography – A Fan Review", 20/04/2014

3. The Abuja Voice, "Alex Ferguson: My Autobiography – A Fan Review", 20/04/2014

4. Universal Reporters, "Alex Ferguson: My Autobiography – A Fan Review ", 20/04/2014

5. The Paradigm, "Alex Ferguson: My Autobiography – A Fan Review", 21/04/2014

6. African Outlook, " Alex Ferguson: My Autobiography – A Fan's Review", 20/04/2014 

7. SkytrendNews, "Alex Ferguson: My Autobiography – A Review By A Fan ", 21/04/2014 

8. Elombah, "Alex Ferguson: My Autobiography – A Fan Review", 21/04/2014 

9. YNaija, "Book review: Sir Alex Ferguson through the eyes of a Man. United fan", 20/04/2014 

10. Naijatowncrier, "Book review: Sir Alex Ferguson through the eyes of a Man. United fan", 20/04/2014 

11. LoladeVille, "Review: Sir Alex Ferguson: My autobiography", 20/04/2014